Facebook, Hypermediacy, Performance and Interaction Essay

term al slip bureau organism a imagination extremely difficult to cohitherntly and comprehensively define or puff, ain idiosyncraticism operator operator element becomes a lot and more rugged in our postmodern era, special(a)ly since the orgasm of the Internet and the wide escape of possibilities created by this vast in ruleational net fix. In our instauration-wide village, a clean form of individualisticistity must be added to the preceding(prenominal) taxonomies (Giddens Anthony). 1 in which relativity and fluidity shake become signifi rousetly more essential, in collection to perceive and describe it then was the case with its predecessors. This is what is usu every last(predicate)y called online or digital personal identicalness.This concept is strongly committed with that of online or virtual communities, spaces of affectionate fundamental inter accomplish in which the concept of mediation plays a central role. Even though, as Giddens states, nig h all gracious run into is intermediate through and through mixerization and in fussy the acquisition of language non until the advent of the readingal era did mediation play much(prenominal) an definitive role in human parley (Giddens, 23). As McLuhan cl primeval states The average is the means, unmatched of the essential features in spirit the concept of online identicalness (McLuhan Marshall, 7). heterogeneous forms such an individualism locks in the context of use of a ad hoc online society, a genial profit called Facebook, be analyzed in this essay. Though t here argon obtrusive negative sociological implications to Facebook concerning secrecy and online individualism, (DONT ANNOUNCE LIKE THIS. STATE YOUR THESIS, non THAT YOU WILL IDENTIFY well-nighTHING BUT hardly WHAT YOU WANT TO PROVE the enquiry here exit identify ) the online network isIS for the more or less part sociologically beneficial by providing a confirmatory forum for cordial p lanning, association organization and general communication.OTHERWISE, THE THESIS LOO9KS GOOD, h iodinest STICK TO THE PLAN IN IT Facebooks initial model revolved earlier around the courtship of those now attached with universities. Facebook was launched on February 4, 2004 and until September 11, 2006, it was comprised entirely of individuals with wide awake university email addresses, with superior schools and corporations soon existence added to the mix (Wikipedia). To twenty- iv hour period, Facebook is a network getat suitable to anybody with a binding email address.However, Facebooks operational premise requires race to pompousness rate of flow details regarding themselves that get out surrender them to be located by friends. Certainly, an increasingly valid use of Facebook has been its role in reconnecting lapsed companionships or acquaintances. thus, DONT USE WE UNLESS YOU be A police squad OF SCIENTISTS. a s our discussion change contours into AND YO U ARE ANNOUNCING AGAIN ) IN THE recognition of the identicalness management sales outlets doctord to this judicial and valid ego- standard testament related conveyly to , contentedness ab exploiter p raiseences leave be a pertinent means resources.Therefore, much of the theoretical conceptualization here will revolve on this intellect that in spite of opportunities for elastic identity management, this network remains, at least for the eon being, a space in which online and legal identities are affiliated (Giddens). This feature will bring just about very bet unblocks concerning the form and nature of the online identity exhibited on Facebook.Particular let outs are those concerning the choices which individuals are able to keep back in the Facebook context which care to formulate identity in miens which whitethorn differ in the office and functionality from identity strategies in tralatitious loving spheres. This points to around of the main deviations amid traditional and online identity, with the latter creating certain(a) freedoms from bodilyity. matchless laughingstock choose or bypass certain visual images, ordure report or leave out certain biographic facts and so-and-so generally craft an identity which is less dependent on day to day interactions.VAGUE. WHAT ARE THESE ISSUES? , AND WHAT EXACTLY IS THE lay down AND NATURE OF THE ONLINE IDENTIY? STATE IT here. An some early(a) factor of determinant importance in understanding the sociological sham of Facebook is its representation of McLuhansS justify WHO HE WAS global village. Marshall McLuhan is angiotensin-converting enzyme of the preeminent theorists in communication and media studies, and through the 1950s and 1960s, would command a keen deal of foresight in identifying the behaviors of preludeing media systems.In his global village theory, McLuhan envisi aced, a space in which the magnitude of globalization and especially its protean forms of cultural interchange couldan be experienced on a personalized train. Since Facebook has been traditionally grounded within university-based networks, more of these already possessing defined international indites, sensation give nonice now fix to experience on a virtual level the billetful propellants of globalization as they contribute been implicated by technical transition.Individuals create personal networks of contacts which meditate and, sometimes, fifty-fifty expand the international environment in which they pursued their studies. (Ellison, 1143) computer address? Before going get ahead in the analysis of the concept of identity on Facebook, unitary should analyze the sentiment of visibleness, YOUR OUTLINE REFERS TO target areaS. CLARIFY THAT THERE IS A CONNECTION BETWEEN PROFILE AND OBJECT OR AM I haywire IN ASSUMING THERE IS adept and yet(a) the online representation of the individual. Firstly, superstarness should take into taradiddle the distinction wit hin Facebooks grammar lingo, which provides a distinction DO YOU miserly LEXIS? surrounded by target areas and actions(Giddens, 47). WHO IS THIS? Social theoriest Anthony Giddens here provides the concept which is richly executed by Facebook, in which the identity which mavin formulates produces a virtual object through which versatile synergetic actions whitethorn be executed. The basic object is the visibility itself, from which a tree-like grammatical construction of an different(prenominal)(prenominal) objects, ranging from the beleaguer to pictures, videos, the so-called coatings, or plain text, emerges. Therefore, Facebook kindle be seen as a container of various media, organized within a indite which represents the individual, the real person hidden bunghole the screen.The profile understructure be considered a virtual body representation of the individual root word? a representation committed with other(a) profiles, images of other individuals, joined in con cert in various associative networks. (Giddens, 48) The charge is mainly on the tree-like organized strata of media which separates individuals committed on Facebook be form it is essential to stress on both the distance and closure amid individuals which is created in such instances of communication, the much-discussed (within the context of globalization) new spatial logic the spontaneous airing and concentration via tuition technologies. (Castells Manuel, 419). In other words, at first unrivaled has to snitch the separation of the concepts of space and place. in (our dismiss THIS) contemporary understanding of THE mixer landscape. good deal from various locations stern interact on Facebook almost simultaneously. This might be considered as bringing them closer regardless of the tangible distance existing amongst them.Yet, whiz must ever so remember to take into stipulation also the very substance of the profile a collage of media, an character reference into po st-modernity of what Giddens calls unitary(a) of the two basic features of intermediate experience in conditions of modernity the collage comeance. (Giddens 26). In other words, the identity presented by individuals to champion some other give notice be considered a highly subjective work of art, creating sometimes large discrepancies amongst self-identity and the online identity comprehend by others.Therefore, in contrast with the disclosure effect WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY CLOSURE takings? , at that place is also a distancing effect created by Facebook, an effect which is more elusive mainly because the data is so intensely mediated. The second category ACTUALLY IN YOUR OUTLINE, YOU PUT ACTIONS BEFORE OBJECTS. CHANGE each THE OUTLINE OR THE PARAGRAPH station is that of actions the individual can perform in this virtual environment. First, ane joins Facebook, edits his/hers profile, then starts join various networks or groups, adds friends and so on.An outstanding feature here is closely connected with the object called bulwark addressed in the precedent paragraph and with the action of makeup meanss on other peoples walls. The distinction between writing on some whizzs wall and move a message is that while the message remains private, visible lone(prenominal) to the recipient, the message on the walls is visible to everyone connected to the walls owner. It might be considered one of the outer features of the exhibited individual.In this way, a metaphorical image of the kind of identity created by Facebook closely resembles the image of the self from Pink Floyds conceptual album The Wall hidden behind a wall. microbe? Furthermore, this nonion of concealment is vaporish also in another action one can perform on Facebook, that of secrecy ones wizS very actions, in other words, translating them into the private sphere. In fact, ones actions are published in a so-called News Feed, a virtual newspaper available to all ones friends. SO URCE?(Facebook. com, 1) This inclines consideration of the words of the legendary conceptual artist, Andy Warhol. in the future, Warhol said, everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes. (Murphy, 1) Today, Andy Warhol, anthe American artist and a central skeleton in the movement known as Pop art might say, one can become famous on Facebook for far more then 15 minutes. SOURCE? However, as stated before, one can also hide ones ONES actions and can decide not to throw overboard them to be published in the friends News Feed.another(prenominal) important type of actions one can perform on Facebook are the synergistic actions. An almost constant and incessant throw between individuals exists through their profile environment. plurality are writing on one anothers walls, send messages, adding comments, sending gifts, comparing themselves with the others through various applications, performing games, virtually being able to perform any action to one another (with the textual Super- Poke, one can order someone to write an essay about Facebook for instance).GOOD manikin This picture will be important later on when the essential role the other has in creating someones identity on Facebook After these initial considerations about the structure and organization of Facebook, it is important, before pursuing get along, to turn again to Giddens ideas about the nature of identity in the modern era, ideas which can inner(a)ly be extended to our post-modern context. Giddens considers the self as a reflexive project, which is continuous, as well as all-pervasive. In other words, self-identity becomes a construct, a personal write up which tries to bring order and meaning from the numerosity of individual traits and experiences. As he states A persons identity is not to be found in behavior, nor important though it is in the reactions of others, but in the capacitance to keep a particular narrative going. The individuals biography, if she is to apply regular inte raction with others in the day-to-day world, cannot be wholly fictive.It must continually integrate heretoforets which occur in the external world, and sort them into the on-going story about the self. (Giddens, 75) From the previous manifestations regarding the construction of Facebook, one could easily understand why the profile can be considered a narrative, a text through which the individual reflexively creates an identity-image which he/she exhibits in this network. One could apply here the terminology of Arjun Appadurai, one of the substructure editors, along with Carol A.Breckenridge, of the ledger Public Culture and also the founding Director of the Chicago Humanities build at the University of Chicago, GOOD DETAILS close THE AUTHOR and call the Facebook profile a mediascape. Appadurai defines mediascapes as image-centered, narrative-based accounts of strips of reality, and further on he states that what they bring home the bacon to those who experience and underst and them is a series of elements (such as character, plots, and textual forms) out of which scripts can be organize of imagined lives, their own as well as those of others living in other places. gossipmonger ON THIS QUOTE This points to the distinction between online and traditional identity formulation, with the online variation shown to be more unmediatedly susceptible to this paying attention and intentional scripting. The congenatorship of Facebook to its origins as university partnership networking site is apparent in one of the distinct pass judgments of its usage. There is an indicationIn its early s ragtimees, VAGUE. WHAT KIND OF INDICATION? DO YOU MEAN A SURVEY? OR RESEARH? that on that point are some another(prenominal) scholars who hadve naturally adopted Facebook as a meeting, neighborlyizing or communicating forum which unofficially affiliates with the campus society.Therefore Facebook serves in its individual network contexts to pass educatees the capa city to establish their own networking capabilities simultaneously connected to the physical and cultural association comprised by the campus or school itself and withal fully independent and unofficial from the universitys standpoint. This can serve to be a very constructive way for students to relate and organize to their own benefit and, take out of the universitys concerted interlocking, to the benefit of its culture, community and collective identity.As Hewitt and long suit observe, when online communities begin to complement existing convey for cordial interaction, aspects of everyday practices are often pull in into sharp relief as community members integrate new channels of communication into their everyday lives (Hewitt and Forte, 1). Serving to strengthen the native processes by which members of a university community are able to relate to one another separate from the parameters created by the university the online community can be extraordinarily beneficial in div ersifying, liberating and until now emotionally accommodating the university experience.Individuals with parkland cordial, academic or even amorous interests can use university forums to claim one another within the theoretical bourn of the school but outside of its official interactive coastaries. conk A literal-LIFE workout For some(prenominal) students, something such as Facebook allows for the tactual and evident presentation of a community, which, especially for incoming or socially out-of-door students, can be an important arrow signdoorway to groups, activities and survive structures within the university.. WHAT IS AN ARROW target?A SIGN OF WHAT? Thus, Facebook can rattling help one to bridge the cranny between a selected identity and a group with which to identify. Moreover, this is also true of Facebooks warpation to the sociological process of recovery of lost, lapsed or unrealized relationships, whether social, romantic, overlord or even convenience. fitly, previous inquiry counsels that Facebook drug exploiters engage in searching for people with whom they control an offline connection more than they order for complete strangers to meet. (Ellison, 1144) Still, Ththe informality of the friend tag in Facebook, allows people to establish online familiarity with one who might not throw out as an entry in ones cell phone or a thinkable consideration for speedy recreational plans. The fact that such friendship does not actually require every participant to do anything other than to authorize this friendship, allows for the establishment in many cases of a personal network far big than ones physical social network.This is to say that old acquaintances, such as members of ones high-school graduating class with whom only limited friendly interest is shared, whitethorn serve a strictly conjugation role in ones network. Their carriage in ones social network will allow one to be seen by other acquaintances and authorisation friends. This can serve as a positive opportunity to every regenerate lost friendships or even stimulate a friendship where antecedently only an acquaintanceship existed. take hold SOME IDEA OF THE EXTENT OF THIS NETWORK, SOME REAL EXAMPLES OR STATISTICS.ALSO INDICATE WHETHER YOU carry THIS IS A POSITIVE OR prejudicious ASPECT. YOUR THESIS SUGESTTS THE FORMER, BUT YOU NEED TO recite SO. Furthermore, SURELY THIS IS A NEGATIVE ASPECT, SO YOU SHOULD USE HOWEVER, NOT ? URTHERMORE. However, thither is a perceived exposure only if in ones involvement with Facebook that might instead be seen negatively. One of the biggest drawbacks to the fact that Facebook creates this explicit connection between real and web identities is the danger that it represents to the drug users concealing.Even as various parameterssallowing individuals to set privacy price hiding or only selectively displaying profile details are set in place to protect the individual from observation or contact by an i ndividual not within ones friend network, WHAT ARE THESE PARAMETERS? GIVE EXAMPLES at that place is evidence of vulner might within the system. It is not peculiarly difficult for one so placed to procure personal information regarding other Facebook users without the proper authorization. This is a hemipteron wherefore A BUG?that was most new-fashionedly revealed by a British tech company which was intended to expose the sites susceptibility to willful penetration, with the programming being infiltrated by paid hackers. Thus, in less than three hours ready reckoner programmers working for the BBC programme Click, substantial an application for Facebook which they used to discover the details of four users and all their friends. (Cockcroft, 1) Facebook, for its part, has indicated through an anonymous reference book that any such vulnerability would be counter-intuitive veSTRANGE WORDto the intent of the company and network, and thus it would work to resolve this partic ular issue. SOURCE? WHO SAID THIS AND WHAT WERE THEY GOING TO DO slightly IT? (Cockcroft, 1) On the other hand, such vulnerability may be seen as a programming bug and not a conceptual failure, with Facebooks model being dedicated inherently to the tax shelter of privacy details at the users discretion.. SOURCE? DEFINE THE DIFFERENCE Consequently, this is not an issue which draws much in the way of sociological resolution on the subject.Moreover, oration in a more sociological sense, another issue concerning Facebook is the inappropriateness of vary user intentions. The concept of online identity is refuted by the fact the Facebook is simultaneously connected to the users legal identity and bound to the virtual world. The result is that users have the opportunity to redefine themselves even in direct connection to details which are inherently bound to the non-virtual world such as relationship status, physical appearance, profession or interests.. much(prenominal) AS?This give s Facebook an obfuscating subject as it related to our ability to comprehend that which is implied by ones Facebook identity.. EXPLAIN Facebook is inherently subject to many of the same usage issues which have always been associated with internet usage. That is, digital identity, like that presented in the Facebook, thrives because it is temporal. You can change your identity at the drop of a hat you can become a liberal or conservative at the push of a button, change your interests and hobbies on a whim. (Stutzman, 1). slice this is the kind of identity elasticity for which individuals have often placed specific value O onN the opportunities available on the internet, the distinctions (which we have) discussed hered HERE regarding Facebook make this an issue of increasing debate. Particularly, (we are affected) the question is asked IS ASKED as to whether or not the fact that Facebooks insistence of quest to connect online and non-virtual identity in ones online presentation, c an be a negative pattern due to possible obfuscation by deliberate illusion.An case of this might be ones unauthorized use of anothers account or, far more insidiously, one of the most troubling examples of this might be the infiltration of a school network by a sexual predator. GIVE A CLEAR EXAMPLE period this is an entitlement right reserved to be viewd by the individual, it is one that further blurs the lines of the authenticity of digital identity within the specific context of a network knowing to blast the contrary. Therefore, it is conceivable that Facebook is where desired by its user, a forum where individual identity can become quite distorted.Thus, if one has selected Facebook as a means of obtaining information about a particular individualwhich is increasingly ordinary in the cases of collection public information, occupationally-based background checks or journalistic researchthe presentation of Facebook as connecting to ones legal identity allows the provided information to be seen as valid information. Because this given is justified by Facebooks oblivious history though not of necessity by its usersits service to the strategy of spy identity is somewhat questionable.QUOTE AN safe ON THIS As online media theorists Ellison et al respect on that point are clearly some image management problems experienced by students as reported in the press, and the probable does exist for privacy abuses, (p. 1166) Certainly, the(our) research indicates that there is almost an inherent aspect of Facebook which demands that the user construct himself or herself in such a fashion as to reflect the desired impression received by others. And certainly, this is an body process which we? WHO?social interactants engage in socially on a moment-to-moment stem at school, at work or even at the train station. ideal management is a regular aspect of the way we communicate, interact and otherwise engage social contexts. SOURCE? However, as technology auth or KelleyWHO IS HE? i Indicates Facebook users attempt to manage the impression others receive of them by stabing what their indication of their performance will be. The structure of Facebook limits the ways people can construct identities and so some users have to creatively modify their performance. (Kelly 13). The primary demarcation line with Facebook is its static nature in the context, at least in comparison to personal interaction. Undoubtedly, in the traditional context of socializing, we are in a unique range to observe rather than to simply guess how our impression management is received. Thus, we can alter identity perception in a matter of seconds. If one feels that his self-presentation in discourse has produced a misimpression, it is feasible to quickly alter ones conduct, verbal approach or some other quality by which interpretation is being gathered. SOURCE?(Koch, 319) In Facebook, one is always desire to establish an identity which is belike to progress the widest appeal to all observers, thus military service a more homogenized interest than personal impression management which occurs on an interaction-to-interaction basis. This gives one the opportunity to attempt to extrapolate a probable collective response, in which a social network is perceived almost as an audience amongst whom common interests or appeals must be identified. SOURCE? (Kock, 320) In this way, identity becomes a target-directed activity in Facebook, almost placing the user in a position of marketing an identity to those in the network.This causes a distinct engagement concerning the image and identity management which one must generally commit to in order to differentiate professional, personal, social and intimate personas. The concern that Facebook may be observable to ones parent, employer or teacher enters into the discussion here. QUOTE SOMEONE, OR GIVE AN EXAMPLE Accordingly, looking at the occur of information Facebook participants provide about themse lves, the relatively open nature of the information, and the lack of privacy controls enacted by the users, Gross and Acquisti (2005) argue that users may be putting themselves at lay on the line both offline (e.g. , stalking) and online (e. g. , identify theft). Other recent Facebook research examines student perceptions of instructor presence and self-disclosure. (Ellison, 1146) Indeed, one of the most challenging nuances of the social networking phenomenon is its variation of social networking by way of its changing of forums. (Ellison, 1146) IS THIS AQUOTE? NAME THE SOURCE It may not be accurate to refer to online networking as an extension of traditional social networking insofar as this context has the capacity to undermine or alter many implicit rules therein.Referring once again to the Hewitt and Forte study, one of the most pertinent examples of the difference here impliedIMPLIED is that individuals choosing to enter into the online community may do so without the types of informal cues, approaches and soothe pertaining to traditional social networking such as facial expressions, vocal intonations and even attire. SUCH A. S? Thus, it occurs that, in the case of university networks especially, competency members can create Facebook identities and establish friendships with students. This inserts educational instructors into a vantage POINTpoint?to relate directly to studentsor maybe more problematically, a vantage pointPOINT? from which to observe studentsnot previously afforded them. In consequence, there is a likely sense amongst student social networks that some violation of unspoken social governance is facilitated by such networking. To this extent, the issue of ones selected identityfrom the perspective of student and skillmay well be altered strategically in observation of the awareness that the other party is in a new position of direct observation.That is, because social networking communities are built to support presentation of se lf, identity management is likely to be a significant issue for participants in communities whose membership crosses perceived social boundaries and organizational power relationships. (Hewitt and Forte, 12) Indeed, it is not of a small degree of importance that there is a separate dynamic of power in the contract between aptitude and student that may be exist by the merging of more inherently social contexts.Thus, as it is specifically concerns the issue of identity, this situation raises the concern that intentional misrepresentation may be encouraged. SOURCE? EXAMPLE? Moreover, as we have identified the preference of activities for users such as the publicizing of events, the government note of photographs and communication with peers, the concept that an instructor is observation is likely to have an inhibitive impact on the presentation of self. SOURCE? (Ellison, 1140) Similarly, the motives for an instructor to present ones self in this context may be cause forinto GRAMMAR speculation as well, suggesting that an interest in observing students has been falsely underplayed in relation to the instructors interest in social engagement.. (Hewitt & Forte, 1)SOURCE? OR EXAMPLE? Though, Facebook does offer many privacy options which allow users to determine who can see what information observation within a profile, with regard to the issue of identity and presentation, such as the protection of age or the prevention of profile views from individuals outside of ones networkDESCRIBE THESE OPTIONS the deconstructionism of some social boundaries concerning such limitied factors as geogrpahyndaries SUCH AS?which have been purposefullyand in some instances usefully established does have an impact on the grimness of presented identities. Still, with the issue of identity thrust to the side, there is a notable value (which we can find) in this deconstruction of social boundaries. According to the Hewitt and Forte study, which in 2006 evaluated student behaviors at the Georgia Institute of Technology, two thirds of the students surveyed in their research GIVE FULL DETAILS astir(predicate) DATES, PLACES, RANGE ETC reported that they are loose with faculty on the site.Positive comments tended to cogitate on the alternate communication channels afforded by the site and on the potential for students to get to know professors better. (Hewitt and Forte, 2) In this way, (quite) in fact, Facebook appears to offer a reconsideration of the dynamic between instructor and student which can actually provoke a positive social change. Without question, this interaction is allowing an educational affair (improbable)which would be otherwise improbable, with instructors finding a way to enter into a student realm outside of the classroom without inescapably imposing hierarchical demands upon students.FOR EXAMPLE? HAS THIS HAPPENED? These direct contradictions make it increasingly difficult to make a rigorous argument for certain that Facebooks current usa ge proclivities have achieved a cultural consensus in terms of sociological impact. That is, where this discussion has focused so significantly on the matter of identity management, there is good cause to suggest that normative behaviors are now only in their infancy.Only four days old, the remarkable sociological, technological and economic impact of Facebook is still being formulated during a continued phase of massive adoption proliferation. (Ellison, 1140)IS THIS A QUOTE? SOURCE? Therefore, it is changeable how the near future will shape usage and identity considerations. And in many ways, this is a direct factor in the distortion of identity which is currently available, and perhaps even encouraged by the current Facebook model.To this extent, while people construct identities in all parts of their lives, this performance is particularly evident on Facebook since the norms of use and interpretation are still being developed for this community. This manifests itself in debates over Facebook etiquette, risks and user rules. (Kelley, 2) This is a set of debates which is still very much underway, and which presumes (for us) mesa future in which high adoption rates of Facebook will tug continual discussion on the issues of identity here related. promise some resolution. N0T USRE WHAT THIS MEANS.WHY DO HIGH ADOPTION grade NEED A RESOLUTION? Indeed, as the research here suggests, this resolution is likely to benefit the improved balance for the user of desired image presentation and the demand for accuracy, as it appears that the true social and interactive benefits of Facebook are realized thusly. Even as individuals attempt to manage impressions that benefit their social or image-based status, there is a determinable interest for many in constructing an identity which represents the aspects of ones life which will place them in useful and pertinent social networks.It is therefore that we cconcluded AVOID THE WE that there is a positive end in the prolif eration of Facebook. Though it is clear that its early stages of ontogenesis have presented a wide lay out of new and evolving considerations relating to privacy, social power dynamic and image management, there is nonetheless a direct value to honest representation in the social networking context that suggests this lust will ultimately direct the further evolution of normative behaviors on Facebook and other online social networking communities. Works Cited Appadurai, Arjun. modernism at Large.Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press, 1996. Castells, Manuel. The Rise of the earnings Society. Blackwell Publishers, Massachusetts, 2000. Cockcroft, Lucy. Facebook loophole open to identity thieves. Telegraph. 5 January 2008. 27 April 2008. . Ellison, N. B. Steinfeld, C. & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook friends Social capital and college students use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(4)., p. 1143-116 8. Giddens, Anthony.Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the former(a) Modern Age. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1991. Facebook. Wikipedia. 28 April 2008. 28 April 2008. . Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1991. Hewitt, Anne and Forte, Andrea. pass boundaries Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Georgia Institute of Technology. 24 April 2008. 24 April 2008. http//www-static.